What type of regionalism is this? Is it sub nationalism Or there should be another term for such things?
What is necessary for a healthy nation: Nationalism or Secularism?
Can Regionalism and Nationalism coexist?
If this is not dowry demand, what is it?
Is it the Clash of Civilizations or Clash of Ignorance?
We all are well aware of the situations in Maharashtra & Bihar.
The start was when Maharashtra politician, Mr. Raj Thakerey started campaign against Bihari/North Indians, which was more of a violent stuff than of the type of our national ethics.
It went on for some time, and further as it was going to be a ended affair, the Railways recruitment board exam pushed some air into it.
What happened next was what we all are well aware.
But the Question that hits me again & again: Who is Raj Thakerey? Does the situation makes him the most prominent well wisher of the marathi population?Is he the most prominent supporter of marathi?
Regretfully, it doesn't seem so.Yes, I am right in my logic.This is not the regionalistic face of a politician.
He is just against people of other regions.When one is full of hatred, how can he be possessing any amount of love & affection.
His statements/activities show that he hates people of other region, it never shows that he loves his own people.
Because it is most simple logic, that a person in love can see the world as a beautiful thing, will love the people who lives in this world.
But the case is different here.He is against humans, may be these humans don't belong to his family, locality, or state.
This is a story of hatred not love. And according to the law of nature, he will get the same, sooner or later.
Also the same logic supports that this is not regionalism, but it is hatred.
Some more Question arises here: When an outsider/insider tries to destabilize our nation, he is termed as terrorist. Why not in this case, this law is abided by? When Bajrang Dal & other Hindu outfits are banned in the name of such hatred, why not Maharashtra Navnirmaan Sena & Raj Thakerey?
