Freedom of Speech vs Freedom To Incite Violence (and Death)

Why is it that when non-Muslims criticize Islam we are called Islamaphobics and racists, and yet nothing is said when they call for death to the Jews and the West? Why is nothing being said? FEAR. Because Mullah's and Imams all over the world are attracting people into their ranks with rabid anti-west/U.S./Jewish rants, preaching Jihad and encouraging them to strap bombs onto their bodies (and the bodies of their kids) all in the name of Allah, and they fear reprisals. And it's not just westerners who are targeted, it's other Muslims who dare to condemn the violence. Why don't those Imams preach brotherhood and love instead of hate, after all Islam is supposed to be the religion of peace, right? Those kinds of hate-fests are despicable, and are nothing more than a means to rile people up. Look at the Nazis and the KKK and what happened in Rwanda. The Hutus took to the airwaves and called for the extermination of the Tutsis. Approximately 800,000 were killed. All for what? Because of a different skin color or religion?

lp4 EmnX4 16105

There is a major difference between freedom of speech (which I will defend with every fiber of my being, as abhorrent as some of it might be) and hate speech which incites people to violence. It's a fine line, but it should be nipped in the bud.

I have never witnessed demonstrations like the following, from non-Muslims, for those who need proof. These were protests in London several years ago.

one xEKFA 16298

and this

two qqDrn 16298

and this

london protest 1 7uLSN 16105

and this

death by islam 2 87gpu 16105

and more threats

three jnT2T 16298

and last but not least

lp6 fJa11 16105

So much for the religion of peace.