EU foreign policy in relation of EC selections
A Much-Needed Shift in Sino-Indian Foreign Policy
Who Runs Saudi Foreign Policy?
Dangerous times for dangerous U.S. Foreign Policy
UK Watchdog Group Finds Palestinians Use EU Foreign Aid To Fund Anti-Israel Hate In Schools
US foreign policy shift: The naughty won't be rewarded anymore!
First few quotes related to selection of EU's top officials:
"Turkey is not a part of Europe and will never be part of Europe." (Mr Van Rompuy)
"If the point of the Lisbon Treaty was to create a more prominent face for Europe, the result on Thursday was the opposite. It appeared to be a political deal that would do little to reduce the power, stature and influence of big nations or their foreign ministers." (New York Times)
"It is jaw-dropping. It is the end of ambition for the E.U. — really disappointing." (Olivier Ferrand, president of Terra Nova, a center-left research institute in France)
How good selection process itself mirrors democratic values and transparency – everybody can estimate.
Before last EU Parliament elections I was debated the following idea in my mind and in my article:
"Protesting over the inability of their politicians to elect a city mayor more than five months after the last elections, local residents in Mostar – Bosnia-Herzegovina – brought a donkey to demonstrations last week, proposing the animal be the city’s new Mayor. "(Lets elect donkey Parliament)
The appointments may be good or bad depending which European perspective one likes most. Besides EC bureaucracy and puppet parliament we now have two more officials without authority, respect and proven skills at top level international politics. This means that big players are still calling to London, Berlin and Paris instead of Brussels. For euroskeptics this guarantees that EU will not be a key player in international politics its role will be controlling citizens with directives in small details, an discussion forum for joint economical actions.
In relation to fieldwork of EU foreign policy more interesting selection was the post of enlargement taken by Czech EU affairs minister Stefan Fuele. Already important position is now even more strong as neighbourhood policy is added under single hat. This means that sc. EU's Eastern Partnership program including cooperation with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, will be coordinated with enlargement procedure which is going on in western Balkans and with Turkey and Iceland.
From my point of view this could preindicate a possible search of “third way” between EU member- and non-membership with some innovative model of “privileged partnership” discussed especially with case of Turkey. The model – when first created – could be copied also with some other countries which now are in enlargement process or included in Eastern Partnership program. Anyway with pragmatic tasks Mr. Fuele's phone may ring more than of Mr. Rompuy's or Mrs. Ashton's phones.
More my views one may find from my BalkanBlog!
